Monday, May 21, 2012

A Weekly Clash

This is an article I wrote that was published in a community newsletter in 2010. Obviously this is a fraught topic and I tried my best to give equal voice to both sides while maintaining a neutral tone.


Every Saturday morning, a small group of people gathers on a sidewalk in front of 1400 Spring Street in Silver Spring. Some of the people hold up placards, pray and occasionally interact with the other people on the sidewalk; mostly college-age women in orange vests that read “Pro-Choice Clinic Escort.” The protesters sometimes refer to them as “death-scorts.” The building behind them holds the local Planned Parenthood clinic, which provides in-house abortions along with other reproductive services for women. The clinic also provides escorts to accompany patients inside the building, if they do not wish to speak with the protesters.

Olga Fairfax, a particularly vocal pro-life activist, tries her best to reach out to the patients entering the building, despite the presence of the escorts. Sporting a red “Pro-Life” tee-shirt and carrying a sign depicting infant body parts, Olga is a staple on the corner of Spring St. and 1st Avenue, setting up large graphic signs and protesting every Saturday, as well as some week days. Dr. Fairfax, (who holds a Ph.D in Counseling), says her main message is that “this is an exploitive situation that helps no one. There is a better way.” On a recent Saturday, she successfully convinced a potential clinic patient to go instead to the nearby Centro Tepayac Women’s Center, a nonprofit Catholic agency which seeks to provide an alternative to abortion through such services as free testing, referrals, counseling, and providing parenting information. (Recently the Montgomery County Council passed a bill requiring the center to post a disclosure sign alerting patients that it is not a medical facility and lacks medical staff.) All services at Centro Tepeyac are free, which Olga compared to the Planned Parenthood clinic, where she says doctors “kill for money.”  She also asserted that the clinic pays the escorts for each patient they successfully bring in, a claim disputed by an escort who wished only to be identified as Paul.

According to Paul, the escorts are “invited guests” of the clinic and come from an all-volunteer organization, the Washington Area Clinic Defense Task Force (WACDTF). Despite the controversy of the situation, he said they try to stay focused on their core message, “which is that women are entitled to access to these clinics for legal reproductive health care.”  If a patient is intercepted by a protestor, escorts will let the patient know that she does not need to speak with the protesters unless she wishes to, and will offer to walk the patient to the building door. While the WACDTF has a strict non-violence policy, Paul says that there have been a few “nasty” verbal confrontations between the two opposing factions sharing the sidewalk, and passersby have occasionally called police.

Mary-Ann Hendler, another pro-life activist, attempts to take a gentler approach. She tells the escorts that she is praying for them, and even invites them to lunch with her.  Asked about her goal in protesting at the clinic, she said, “We are trying to help women see other alternatives – other things they haven’t thought of, such as adoption.  Nobody can deny the truth of what’s happening, the reality of it. They are also putting their souls at serious risk of being lost forever.”  Showing similar concern, a group from St. Bernadette's Catholic Church joins in prayer in front of the clinic on a weekly basis.

On any given Saturday morning, actual patients entering the clinic seem sparse in number, but the few who arrive can expect to be met by both activists and escorts, all of whom feel it is their duty to be present where they are needed.

5 comments:

  1. I think you did a nice job keeping a neutral tone. It is definitely a tough topic to write about and who you/people in general are successful in talking to for these pieces may tilt the story one way or another (not saying that happened here). You were able to get both sides of it, which is great and very important. I also appreciate the fact that you spoke to two different types of Pro-Lifers.

    I work near a Planned Parenthood and the protesters are out there every Friday morning. They mostly just wave their pamphlets in the air, but I do get nervous that I'm going to hit one of them with my car as I pull in!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you, Avery. I never really received direct feedback from the community so it's nice to hear how it came across.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I also appreciate the neutral tone since you say this was your objective. But this is such a difficult matter - as far as I know, praying never solves real problems.

    ReplyDelete
  4. What a compelling story. I think it's naive for the protester to state, "We are trying to help women see other alternatives – other things they haven’t thought of, such as adoption." As if the patients are who are seeking abortions haven't thought of adoption as an alternative! It makes the erroneous assumption that the patients are uneducated and are being lured in to Planned Parenthood, when Planned Parenthood is probably bringing relief to them in a situation of last resort. (This also completely ignores the fact that the majority of patients passing through their doors are NOT going there for abortions, but how we like to demonize Planned Parenthood.) Phew! As someone who is clearly pro-choice, I find this well-written. That quote alone tells its own story without the author needing to spell it out for them. Well done!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Viva, it is difficult not to let our own opinions seep into controversial articles we write. I still do not know where you stand on the issue, so you were successful. Your conclusion was delicate and rounded the article well.

    I appreciate the comments by @amaiatravels which illustrate how far you could go writing about this issue. Such a complex topic could be expanded infinitely. You were able to write a concise article illustrating the involvement of two factions without delving into the opinions of doctors, patients, lawmakers, male-counterparts, etc.

    I do not know where this was published but your neutrality was probably expected. Personally, I like to know where a writer stands on issues which may something your hashtag could indicate.

    ReplyDelete